Influence
January 14, 2025

Screening for Osteoporosis to Prevent Fractures: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Sarah Wiehe, MD

Published in JAMA. Here is a link to the article.

Regenstrief Institute authors: Sarah Wiehe, MD, MPH

Abstract

Importance: Osteoporotic fractures are associated with psychological distress, subsequent fractures, loss of independence, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, and death.

Objective: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures in adults 40 years or older with no known diagnosis of osteoporosis or history of fragility fracture.

Population: Adults 40 years or older without known osteoporosis or history of fragility fractures.

Evidence assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years at increased risk has moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient and the balance of benefits and harms for screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men cannot be determined.

Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older. (B recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years who are at increased risk for an osteoporotic fracture as estimated by clinical risk assessment. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men. (I statement).

US Preventive Services Task ForceWanda K Nicholson 1Michael Silverstein 2John B Wong 3David Chelmow 4Tumaini Rucker Coker 5Esa M Davis 6Carlos Roberto Jaén 7Marie Krousel-Wood 8Sei Lee 9Li Li 10Carol M Mangione 11Gbenga Ogedegbe 12Goutham Rao 13John M Ruiz 14James Stevermer 15Joel Tsevat 7Sandra Millon Underwood 16Sarah Wiehe 17

Affiliations

1George Washington University, Washington, DC.

2Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

3Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

4Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

5University of Washington, Seattle.

6University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.

7University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.

8Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.

9University of California, San Francisco.

10University of Virginia, Charlottesville.

11University of California, Los Angeles.

12New York University, New York, New York.

13Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

14University of Arizona, Tucson.

15University of Missouri, Columbia.

16University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

17Indiana University, Bloomington.

Related News

LOINC® biannual stakeholder webinar to highlight latest updates and strategic initiatives

LOINC® biannual stakeholder webinar to highlight latest updates and strategic initiatives

LOINC® from Regenstrief Institute will host a biannual stakeholder meeting on March 25, 2025. During the meeting, held via

AI model predicting two-year risk of common heart disorder can easily be integrated into healthcare workflow

Non-invasive, inexpensive approach provides a practical option for proactive screening INDIANAPOLIS – AFib (short for atrial fibrillation), a common

Kun Huang, PhD

Predicting Alzheimer’s disease subtypes and understanding their molecular characteristics in living patients with transcriptomic trajectory profiling

Published in the Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. Here is a link to the article.